Choose by operating model: Coinvay provides a hosted merchant checkout for its supported networks, while BTCPay Server gives technically prepared merchants open-source Bitcoin and Lightning infrastructure they can control.
Published by Coinvay. Provider facts were checked against official sources on 27 October 2026. Availability, fees and terms can change. Coinvay’s 0% invoice commission excludes blockchain fees and optional merchant plans.
Software cost is only one part of the choice
BTCPay Server's documentation describes free, open-source, non-custodial payment processing, with Bitcoin on-chain and Lightning support. Its deployment guidance explains that merchants still need hosting, whether self-managed or supplied by another host. Blockchain transaction fees remain separate. These facts were checked on 27 October 2026.
Coinvay's current invoice commission is 0%, with optional merchant plans and usage limits. It is a hosted service rather than a promise that you receive the same node-level control as a self-hosted Bitcoin stack. Compare the complete operating model before comparing headline fees.
| Area | Coinvay | BTCPay Server |
|---|---|---|
| Operating model | Hosted merchant application | Open-source, self-hosted or third-party hosted |
| Invoice commission | Currently 0%; merchant plans separate | No software processing commission; infrastructure costs remain |
| Payment focus | Configured supported mainnet routes | Bitcoin on-chain and Lightning infrastructure |
Decide who will run the payment infrastructure
A team evaluating self-hosting should budget for upgrades, monitoring, backups and incident ownership. These are planning questions, not allegations that open-source software is harder or less reliable. A well-equipped infrastructure team may value direct control more than a managed dashboard.
For Coinvay, focus the trial on receiving-wallet configuration, supported assets, order creation and server-side payment confirmation. Do not assume that generic cryptocurrency support implies Lightning support. A merchant whose business depends on Lightning should explicitly verify that requirement rather than substituting a Bitcoin on-chain checkout.
A hypothetical two-store comparison
Consider two hypothetical shops. One sells Bitcoin-related hardware and already operates a Lightning node. The other sells downloadable templates to customers paying across several chains and has no staff assigned to nodes. They should not receive the same gateway recommendation simply because both want to avoid a percentage fee.
The first shop can evaluate BTCPay's infrastructure controls against its existing expertise. The second can test whether Coinvay's supported networks and hosted workflow cover its customers. Both should rehearse a delayed payment and retain a second way to reconcile orders from blockchain evidence.
Practical checklist
- List Bitcoin on-chain, Lightning and other network requirements separately.
- Assign responsibility for hosting, updates and backups before choosing self-hosting.
- Include network fees and infrastructure or merchant-plan costs in your budget.
- Test order-status confirmation and merchant support procedures.
Common questions
Does BTCPay Server require payment-processing commission?+
Its documentation describes the software as free and non-custodial. Hosting arrangements and blockchain fees are separate costs; a third-party host may have its own commercial terms.
Should every small merchant choose hosted checkout?+
No. Technical experience, desired control and required payment networks matter more than business size alone. Run a representative order through the system you plan to operate.
Sources and further reading
Primary references and Coinvay product documentation. Check the linked pages for current details.
AI-assisted drafting, published by Coinvay. Examples are illustrative. Read our editorial approach.